<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Ben Dyson &#187; Objections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bendyson.com/category/objections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bendyson.com</link>
	<description>Solutions to the Financial Crisis...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Objections: &#8220;The Reform Would Be Inflationary&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bendyson.com/objections-the-reform-would-be-inflationary/2009/09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bendyson.com/objections-the-reform-would-be-inflationary/2009/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bendyson.com/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The risk of inflation is one of the most common knee-jerk responses to the suggestion that government should take responsibility for issuing the nation&#8217;s money supply. In reality, the risks of inflation would actually be less under the reformed system than they are today. The Logic of the Objection The logic of this argument is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bendyson.com/objections-the-reform-would-be-inflationary/2009/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Objections&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bendyson.com/the-objections/2009/09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bendyson.com/the-objections/2009/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dyson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Objections]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bendyson.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a number of common objections to the kind of reform proposed on this site. Most of these objections fall into the following categories: Misunderstandings &#38; misconceptions Knee-jerk reactions Poor logic Over the next few articles I will be addressing each of these concerns one by one, and explaining why they are invalid. Some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bendyson.com/the-objections/2009/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

